Skip to main content

Stages of Change for Weight Loss Revisited

How embarrassing.  I clicked on the link to an old post which is getting a lot of hits this week.  It's all about how diets don't work.  And I found four ads about weight loss.

Okay, maybe there is helpful information in those ads.  I hope so, because I put ads on my site to give you resources beyond what my poor brain can contrive. But I don't know, because I get paid by how often somebody looks at them, and the contract says I am not allowed to look at them myself.  I am also not allowed to encourage you to look at them.  That's up to you.  Never mind.


Anyway, it's hard to avoid ads for weight loss these days.  It's that time of year.  Yank Toys 'R Us on Christmas Day.  Haul out Jenny Craig.  A couple weeks and the Super Bowl will move us on to Doritos and Bud Weiser.


Meanwhile, that old post is part of a series that I do recommend to you if you are thinking about your health these days.  Managing weight is one health issue.  Actually, the series is more about how you eat than about how you lose weight.  In particular, it is about changing habits -- how you get from one side of the canyon, I need to change my old habit to the other, I have a new habit.  You do it one step at a time.


There it is, the road map.  It will take longer than the amount of time scheduled for Jenny Craig ads to run before they are replaced by Bud Weiser and Doritos.  But one step at a time, it will get you where you want to go.

I wrote about this subject off and on for several months a couple years ago.  You don't usually find weight loss ads at Prozac Monologues.  I took up the topic first, because the meds that us loonies take cause ballooning weight gain that kills us off an average of some fifteen years sooner than everybody else.  And our doctors usually give us ineffective advice, if any, about that.  This part of our recovery, we have to do ourselves.  I continued, because I discovered that food habits are about brain science.  Keep following links to the next article in the series, and the next, and you will learn about the brain's g-spot!



With that to tickle your fancy, start here.  The list of links for each next post is at the bottom.

Have a happy and healthy New Year!

 photo of tape measure from microsoft.com
photo of Glen Canyon by Sascha Brück, used under the Creative Commons license
Stages of Change graphic by Todd Atkins and in the public domain
Nucleus Accumbens graphic from The brain.mcgill.ca, used under the Creative Commons license

Comments

  1. I agree with you. We should have to change our eating habits for our perfect weight loss because a good diet is very important in this case.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Loony Saints - Margaret of Cortona Edition

Every once in a while, Prozac Monologues reaches into my Roman Catholic childhood's fascination with saints, especially the ones who today might be assigned a diagnostic code in the DSM.  Twice, Lent Madness has introduced me to new ones that I share with you.



A few years ago it was Christina the Astonishing.










Today it's Margaret of Cortona.  If you're a Lent Madness regular, you'd expect Margaret to be a shoe in for the first round of voting, where her competition is a stuffy old bishop/theologian, because Margaret became a Franciscan and, more significantly, her story features a dog.  Lent Madness voters are suckers for dogs.

Mood Charts Revisited

Mood chart is one of the top search terms that bring people to Prozac Monologues.  I wrote about mood charts in July, 2010, first as a recovery tool and later as a way to illustrate the differences between various mood disorders.  Both posts promised sequels, promises that remained unfulfillable until now that I have spent several months doing cognitive remediation at Lumosity.com.  Maybe cognitive remediation is worth another post -- later.

Following last week's tale of misdiagnosis and mistreatment, this week's long delayed return to mood charts seems timely.

What is a Mood Chart

Introducing Allen Frances

Allen Frances was the editor of the DSM-IV, first published in 1990.  He is now the fiercest critic of its next major revision, the DSM-5.  For over three years, he has been blogging weekly to this end at Psychology Today.  This week I will summarize his steady drumbeat.  I hope soon to publish an open letter to him.

Frances' complaint in a nutshell is that the DSM-5 creates fad diagnoses and changes criteria of older diagnoses to medicalize a whole range of normal behavior and miseries.  The link lists these problem diagnoses and a number of the following points, in an article published all over town last December.

These issues have been discussed widely, in public and private circles.  I am not qualified to address each point, though I did give a series over to one of them, the bereavement exclusion.  The best of the batch, if I do say so myself, is Grief/Depression III - Telling the Difference, which got quoted in correspondence among the big boys.