Skip to main content

Bipolar — What’s That in Your Genes

Your genes — that’s where bipolar gets started. Of all the mental illnesses, bipolar is the most heritable. That means it has the strongest genetic connection. In studies of identical twins, if one twin has bipolar, so does the other in 75% of the pairs. That compares to 60% with depression and 35% with schizophrenia.

If one parent has bipolar, a child is 13 times more likely to develop bipolar than a child with parents who do not have the disorder. If both parents have it, the child is 36 times more likely to develop it.

So you go to your doc and present symptoms of depression. Your doc will ask, Does anyone in your family have bipolar? But that's not the question you will answer. When you say No, the question you are probably answering is, Has anybody in your family ever been diagnosed with bipolar — that you know about?


It took years, but eventually I learned, when my doc asked that question, that my answer was to shrug and say, Not that I know, but my mother was married five times.

He nodded and made his note.

So that’s the deal. You don’t know. Read World Bipolar Day and the Color Red with your parents in mind and that cousin nobody talks about. If it fits, mention it. If your doc doesn’t probe the issue, but prescribes an antidepressant without a mood stabilizer, get a second opinion.

There are many ways that bipolar lurks in a family history, multiple divorces, recurrent depressions, a criminal background, flamboyant behavior, sexual exploits, overspending, even astounding accomplishments.

Alcoholism is another clue. The two often go together, and even when they don’t coincide in the same person (that's called co-morbidity), people with bipolar often have family with alcoholism; people with alcoholism often have family with bipolar. Demi Lovato - Bipolar Warrior has more about that.

But understand, there is no smoking gun, no single genetic bullet either to dodge or bring you down. It’s a whole constellation of genes, little variations in the DNA that nudge in one direction or another. The more nudges, the greater the chance that signs show up, a bit of moodiness, an occasional surge of energy or productivity, a certain originality of thinking, an extra delight in physical sensations, poor sleep patterns, a sensitivity to disruptions of schedule, a tendency to take risks, difficulty recovering from stressful events. Combine enough nudges with early childhood trauma to trip the trigger, you get bipolar.

That's not all there is to it. Lots of people with two afflicted parents are just fine. People with no discernible family history get diagnosed with bipolar.

Or rather, some variation of bipolar. The DSM identifies Bipolar I, Bipolar I, Cyclothymia, and Bipolar NOS (not otherwise identified). But the DSM is referring to symptoms and their severity. The genetics people are exploring the different constellations of genetic variations that produce assorted collections symptoms.

The popular picture of up/down is laughably simplistic. So is the DSM’s symptom counting, five of nine from this column, three or maybe four from that. Someday we will have a different way to diagnose, and probably a different set of diagnoses. Better diagnosis opens a window for better treatment.

Meanwhile, here is the bottom line. Bipolar is treatable. It’s difficult to treat. But it’s treatable. When one medication poops out, chances are a new, more expensive one has been developed. And there is a host of non-pharmaceutical treatments to be tried. But the real breakthroughs are yet to come.

dna graphic created by Zyphyris, used under GNU Free Documentation License
shoe selfie by author
Charlie and Linus from flair

Comments

Popular Posts

Loony Saints - Margaret of Cortona Edition

Every once in a while, Prozac Monologues reaches into my Roman Catholic childhood's fascination with saints, especially the ones who today might be assigned a diagnostic code in the DSM.  Twice, Lent Madness has introduced me to new ones that I share with you.



A few years ago it was Christina the Astonishing.










Today it's Margaret of Cortona.  If you're a Lent Madness regular, you'd expect Margaret to be a shoe in for the first round of voting, where her competition is a stuffy old bishop/theologian, because Margaret became a Franciscan and, more significantly, her story features a dog.  Lent Madness voters are suckers for dogs.

Mood Charts Revisited

Mood chart is one of the top search terms that bring people to Prozac Monologues.  I wrote about mood charts in July, 2010, first as a recovery tool and later as a way to illustrate the differences between various mood disorders.  Both posts promised sequels, promises that remained unfulfillable until now that I have spent several months doing cognitive remediation at Lumosity.com.  Maybe cognitive remediation is worth another post -- later.

Following last week's tale of misdiagnosis and mistreatment, this week's long delayed return to mood charts seems timely.

What is a Mood Chart

Introducing Allen Frances

Allen Frances was the editor of the DSM-IV, first published in 1990.  He is now the fiercest critic of its next major revision, the DSM-5.  For over three years, he has been blogging weekly to this end at Psychology Today.  This week I will summarize his steady drumbeat.  I hope soon to publish an open letter to him.

Frances' complaint in a nutshell is that the DSM-5 creates fad diagnoses and changes criteria of older diagnoses to medicalize a whole range of normal behavior and miseries.  The link lists these problem diagnoses and a number of the following points, in an article published all over town last December.

These issues have been discussed widely, in public and private circles.  I am not qualified to address each point, though I did give a series over to one of them, the bereavement exclusion.  The best of the batch, if I do say so myself, is Grief/Depression III - Telling the Difference, which got quoted in correspondence among the big boys.