Well. That was disturbing. To my knowledge, I do not know the person who called me Dearest Willa, said I need to learn forgiveness, and then told me to drop dead. It occurs to me that facts have power, if they evoked this response.
My facts come from the Centers for Disease Control, Bureau of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation, from reports and data bases that count people who died and how they died. That is all these sources did -- they counted. They made no policy recommendations.
I make no policy recommendations in this series, either. I am reporting their numbers. I do hope they are not useless numbers. I offer them to you to help you weigh the costs and benefits of gun ownership.
Now, back to where this post used to begin...
Wondering About Sandy Hook
After that, we have a lot of different ideas.
I decided to approach the issue with curiosity. I sat down, wrote a list of questions, then went off to the internet in search of facts. Some of these facts led to more questions, more research, more facts. Here then are some facts.
Death by Firearms
31,076 people died by firearms. 19,392 of these people, 61% committed suicide. They get their turn next week. Another 606 died from accidents with firearms.
11,078 people were victims of homicide. This number, by the way, is going down in recent years, down as a percentage of all deaths, down as a percentage of death by firearms, down also in real numbers. I expect the number of homicides on television is going up, but that is beyond the scope of my research this month.
Back to Sandy Hook.
How Many People Die by Mass Murder?
Mass murder is common enough in the US that there is an official definition, to make studying mass murder more rigorous. If four or more people are killed, not counting the killer, that is mass murder.
It happens a lot. If we had to wait until the end of a period of mourning to discuss firearms in the US, we would never catch long enough a break. So we are having this discussion while the carnage continues.
USA Today looked up the FBI statistics on this and reported, mass murder happens every other week. The thing is, so many people get murdered every day, mass murder is dwarfed by domestic assault, crime of passion, murder in the commission of a crime, and so on.
Now, not all these died by firearms. Firearms were used in 107 out of 156 incidents, most often (68 times) handguns. The weapons used in the remaining 49 incidents included fire, knives, blunt objects, and miscellaneous others.
I do not have the stats for what portion of the death toll was from firearms, just the total, 774 over five years. It stands to reason that killers armed with a gun can kill more people more quickly than those armed with a baseball bat. Perhaps we will develop another term for the mall and school shootings, and start recording these statistics separately from the man in my hometown who killed his wife, children and himself. The public killings would be less than 1%. Their rarity does not make them less horrific.
But what about the other 71,171 people who were murdered in the US between 2006 and 2010? The news outlets do not linger over these lives lost. Let's look anyway.
How Many People Are Killed in Domestic Disputes?
Oh, now that is a bigger number.
7,898 victims of intimate homicide in the five years 2000-2004. Over ten times as many people died at the hand of their current or former intimate partner than died in mass murder.
The Bureau of Justice published Family Violence Statistics in June 2005. It reports that 22.9% of murders in 2002 were committed by a family member, over 4000 of that year's 17,638 homicides. 9% of the people murdered in 2002 were spouses of their murderer, intimate homicide. 6% of the victims were murdered by their parents. Half of family murders were committed with a firearm.
Firearms are used in about 2/3rds of intimate partner homicides. When the assailant uses a firearm, the victim is 12 times more likely to die than if another weapon or type of attack were used. -- That is called lethality. Guns are more effective in causing death than other means. If a gun is not at hand at the time of the assault, the victim's chances of survival are improved, by a factor of 12.
By the way, in 38% of homicides involving intimate partners, somebody else got killed, as well.
Who Shoots a Family Member?
First and foremost, somebody who has a gun.
Relation of Gun Ownership and Homicide
Run the numbers any way you want to. Compare any Neighborhood A to any similar Neighborhood B. They may both be high crime areas or low crime areas; they may both be high income or low income; high or low unemployment; urban, suburban or rural; they may be tea-totaling neighborhoods or a bar on every corner. If you compare two neighborhoods that are similar in any of these aspects, the homicide rates in which a firearm is not used will be the same. Same rate of homicide by knife, baseball bat, arson, etc. But if Neighborhood A has more guns than Neighborhood B, Neighborhood A will have a higher homicide rate overall, because more people will use them to shoot other people dead.
More Guns = More Dead. No matter how you slice the demographic pie. More dead women, more dead men, more dead children.
Back to Intimate Homicide -- The Role of Alcohol and Drugs
Remember, 22.9% of all murders in the US are committed by a family members. When victims of nonfatal domestic attacks were asked whether their attacker was under the influence of alcohol or drugs, about 19% did not know. 47% who did know said yes. The rate of intoxication is higher for family assault than for friend or stranger assault, and highest when the victim is a boyfriend or girlfriend.
There will be some discussion of impulsivity in suicide in this series' next post. An unanswered question here is how many homicides are impulsive, not premeditated. That data would be difficult to determine with accuracy, since it would come from the courtroom and plea bargains.
One last set of facts:
How Many Murders are Committed by Mentally Ill People?
About one in every five people across a lifetime will experience a mental illness. That figure is obtained by sampling. There has been no attempt actually to keep track of us all. We immediately hit the methodologically impenetrable wall of diagnosis.
Casting about for some objective measure to define seriously mentally ill, the research looks at people who commit violent crime who have been hospitalized for mental illness.
Statistics do sometimes mislead, and this might be one of those cases. There is a shortage of hospital beds on psych wards across the country, with variation according to locale. In many places you can get a bed only if you are more psychotic than the person they will have to discharge so they can admit you. But once in while, if the moon is not full, you can get in merely by being a danger to yourself.
So measuring seriously mentally ill by admission to hospital will miss people roaming the streets and will count people who are perfectly harmless. But by that measure, 1.5% of the people in the US are or have been seriously mentally ill.
Chicken and Egg Issues -- Which Came First?
But there are problems of confounding factors in establishing the link to violence. A higher proportion of people who are mentally ill live in crime-ridden neighborhoods or even on the street. They are more likely to be poor, unemployed, have substance abuse issues, a whole panoply of co-occurring conditions that are themselves risk factors for violent crime.
MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study, out of the University of Virginia, attempted to disentangle these factors, to compare seriously mentally ill people who live in the suburbs to other people who live in the suburbs, seriously mentally ill people who were abused as children with other people who were abused as children, seriously mentally ill people who abuse alcohol with other people who abuse alcohol...
If you take away substance abuse, seriously mentally ill people are no more likely to commit violent crime than other people who live in their same neighborhoods. The presence of delusions does not increase risk of committing violent crime, even delusions that others are trying to harm them or control them.
In fact, people with schizophrenia have the lowest rates of violence.
Substance Abuse and Homicide
On the other hand, substance abuse, with or without a co-occurring mental illness is an overwhelming risk factor for violence.
relationship between alcohol and violent crime. In part:
**It is estimated that 32 to 50% of homicides are preceded by alcohol consumption by the perpetrator.
**Between 31 and 36% of prisoners convicted of a violent crime against an intimate reported that they were drinking alcohol at the time of the offense. These figures rise to approximately 50% when reports from those who were consuming both alcohol and drugs are considered.
Finally, the combination of substance abuse and mental illness raises the risk of violence. People with schizophrenia have rates of substance abuse four times (47%) that of the general population. People with bipolar have five times (61%) the general rate. As a consequence, the number I found repeated most often, though it didn't rise to my desired level of confidence, was 5% of violent crime committed by that 1.5% of people who are seriously mentally ill.
So that's it. That's what I've got. Well, I have lots more, but I weeded out sources that are advocacy groups of whatever stripe, including the New York Times quoting doctors who have their books to sell.
- That mass murders are such a small portion of the total homicide picture.
- That domestic murder is such a large portion. I guess this is a case where I have become so inured to the existence of domestic violence from my years as a parish priest, I stopped seeing it, or considering where it could lead.
- That alcohol is such a large portion of the picture.
Were you surprised, too?
Next time I turn to the biggest portion of death by firearms -- suicide.